LANCAR

Language and Cognition in Argumentation

Skip to content

Menu

About
Research projects
People
Impact
Information for students
News

Posted on 7 October 202210 October 2022
by lancaraclc

How persuasive is AI-generated argumentation?

How persuasive is AI-generated argumentation? Martin Hinton and Jean Wagemans have analyzed the quality of an argumentative text produced by the GPT-3 AI text generator. Their findings are published in the journal Argument & Computation. You can read the article here.

Share this:

WhatsApp
Email
Tweet

Related

Post navigation

Previous Thierry Herman visiting

Next Contemporary approaches to fallacy theory

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Δ

Search for:

Follow LANCAR on WordPress.com

Recent Posts

LANCAR Annotation Workshop
Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI
How to identify an argument type?
Can an AI Analyze Arguments? Argument-Checking and the Challenges of Assessing the Quality of Online Information
Human-computer interaction tools with gameful design for critical thinking the media ecosystem
New book by Federica Russo
Contemporary approaches to fallacy theory
How persuasive is AI-generated argumentation?
Thierry Herman visiting
Postdoc Information Quality and Argument-Checking
Adpositional Argumentation: How logic originates in natural argumentative discourse
On the rational resolution of (deep) disagreements

Follow Following
- LANCAR
- Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

Loading Comments...

Write a Comment...

Email (Required)

Name (Required)

Website